Cam Scott is Contributing Editor for Cheek Teeth. Learn more about his work here.
It is strange to think that something as personally
generative and craft-oriented as writing, might require that the writer belong to a group
or movement. Or that poetry, in
particular, might require it. But over and over, of all the strange demands I’ve
intuited as a writer and poet, the pull to group up, group out, and find
community is the strangest. The truth is
I don’t really like to write in a group or with a group. A crowded bus ride to
work? Sure. The library? Yep. Ye old watering hole? The darker the beer and the
darker the hole the better. But with a
group of prompt-riffing ruffians? Eh. And I sometimes wonder which is stranger,
the fact that I feel this way about writing groups, or the fact that I also
feel like I can’t live without them and am a flare-wearing member, i.e. buttons
of the pin-on variety, that say things like “Magical Metaphor Tour 08’,” “My
Pen is My Sword,” and “Howl Like You Mean It.”
As in, I’ve belonged to no less than four blogging poetry
groups, all of which have failed over time. A few email poetry groups, which
have begun to dwindle and shrink. Participated in more poetry workshops than I
have fingers and toes. Taught poetry workshops. And have even performed in a
spoken word group called “Wild Word” and am far from what would be considered a
spoken word poet. Seriously. Stomp. Spit. Snap. Spit. Stomp.
I have not yet joined a poetry publishing cooperative,
wherein a small group of poets publish each others' books. Nor, due to my own
hang-ups and wanting to be accepted, popular, and whirling through the whirly-gig space of published poetry land, will I--which sometimes makes me think,
between slamsara-ing through the metaphysical world and getting dumb pounded and
dumb founded in the physical world, I will never cough up enough money or get
lucky enough to win a poetry contest, and might possibly never end up with a
book of published poems. Which in the grand scheme of things is alright. Like your grandma just died and it is
alright. A better kind of place alright. The book pie in the sky place. The Bookie-Wookie-Chelsea-Handler
crowd isn’t here kind of place. Writing,
and in particular writing poetry, is often that thing that pushes me to be a
better person. Pay attention. Learn. Get walloped and humbled and hang nailed.
And ultimately, over and over again, happy.
Because, brace yourself, I’m going to use an illegal writing word: I
really love to write.
A couple of years ago, between feeling my job at a
literary non-profit slipping through my fingers and wanting desperately to find
and create a community of poets in the valley where I live, I started a poetry
group. What I needed at the time was to
have a group of poets that met weekly to discuss poetry. (Not to be confused
with meeting up with a poet buddy once in a while which is, can, and often
trumps poetry groups in the first place). The once a month readings in the valley where I live offer a platform for
reading but not the opportunity to really get into the guts of poems through
analysis. Like Damon (see his recent post on Cheek Teeth, “Poetry, U.S.A.”), I often
approach a poem paying attention to line, image, and sound. I want to see what and how a poem is doing
what it is doing. I want to steal it. Roll in it. Whatever. I just want more
practicing poets in the community where I live who are serious about poetry.
For people in my own poetic community to be able to push the poetic envelope. And
for a while I had that.
When I left last September and hit the road for Residency
Land, I left the group to fare on its own. It has faired well, grown, and
turned, for better or for worse, into a group that critiques each others' poems
with comments like, “I like that line” or, “What I would do is…” They do more
critique, and maybe in the end are more motivated to generate because they aren’t
reading as many published poems and they have an audience to read theirs. But the teacher in me cringes. And the student in me, who has spent many a
long hour in critique-based workshops listening to egos struggle for praise or
to be heard or torn down, cringes, too. Now, strange as it is to say, I don’t know if the workshop group I
started is right for me. And that is ok, too. Maybe it is time for the cell to
split and keep growing. Double down. Divide and conquer. Who knows. The thing
that I love even more than line, image, and sound in a poem is listening for
the poet’s voice. Nothing drowns voice quicker than ego--it
is like squirting ketchup over vanilla ice cream--and one of the reasons why I
think being a poet is so hard. The ego always wants in. And that, too, is ok.
The condiments of life have their place in the refrigerator, but remember, when
the mayo goes bad it goes really, really, bad.

Cam,
ReplyDeleteWell, well, I haven't even been the unnamed and dreaded "what's not working in my life" topic of a blog. Big day in a young writer's life! Would really like to do the unthinkable, analyze your analysis of the group at our next poetry group grope!
Could be time to consider a reverse spin-off of the group. One which you spin-off and create a new, oh my god yet another, group more in keeping with your wishes. Personally, I miss the ole' velvet covered sledge hammer that dismantles verse, free or other, in the full light of the poet's ego.
As always, your are a wonderful catalyst for exploration. Rest easy knowing you have been the Creator of our group which has provided so much joy for so many of us "I like it..." poets!
PC
Nothing drowns voice quicker than ego--it is like squirting ketchup over vanilla ice cream. This is the best line I've read today. Thanks
ReplyDeleteinteresting topic, cam. totally speaks to part of a writer's/artist's necessary tension, i think, which is to work in isolation while requiring support. kind of an odd place. good pic of ginsberg and crew, too.
ReplyDelete